First published online February 21, 2008
Stem Cells
Vol. 26 No.
5
May 2008, pp.
1253
-1264
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0691; www.StemCells.com
© 2008 AlphaMed Press
TISSUE-SPECIFIC STEM CELLS |
Reciprocal Intraepithelial Interactions Between TP63 and Hedgehog Signaling Regulate Quiescence and Activation of Progenitor Elaboration by Mammary Stem Cells
Na Lia,
Samer Singha,
Pratima Cherukuria,
Hua Lia,
Ziqiang Yuana,
Leif W. Ellisenb,
Baolin Wangc,
David Robbinsa,
James DiRenzoa
aDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA;
bDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
cDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
Key Words. Mammary stem cells • Mammary progenitors • Quiescence • TP63 • Hedgehog • Gli3
Correspondence: James DiRenzo, Ph.D., Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School, 7650 Remsen, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA. Telephone: 603-650-1794; Fax: 603-650-1129; e-mail: james.direnzo{at}dartmouth.edu
Received August 20, 2007;
accepted for publication February 12, 2008.
First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS February 21, 2008.
TP63 is required for preservation of epithelial regenerative stasis and regulates the activity of diverse genetic pathways; however, specific effector pathways are poorly understood. Data presented here indicate that reciprocal regulatory interactions between hedgehog signaling and TP63 mediate stage-specific effects on proliferation and clonigenicity of separable enriched mammary stem and progenitor fractions. Analysis of
N-p63 and TA-p63 indicates segregated expression in mammary stem and progenitor fractions, respectively, demonstrating that differential TP63 promoter selection occurs during elaboration of mammary progenitors by mammary stem cells. This segregation underlies mammary progenitor-specific expression of Indian Hedgehog, identifying it as a binary transcriptional target of TP63. Hedgehog activation in vivo enhances elaboration of mammary progenitors and decreases label retention within mammary stem cell-enriched fractions, suggesting that hedgehog exerts a mitogenic effect on mammary stem cells. Hedgehog signaling promotes differential TP63 promoter usage via disruption of Gli3 or Gli3R accumulation, and shRNA-mediated disruption of Gli3 expression was sufficient to alter TP63 promoter usage and enhance clonigenicity of mammary stem cells. Finally, hedgehog signaling is enhanced during pregnancy, where it contributes to expansion of the mammary progenitor compartment. These studies support a model in which hedgehog activates elaboration and differentiation of mammary progenitors via differential TP63 promoter selection and forfeiture of self-renewing capacity.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Copyright © 2008 by AlphaMed Press.