Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Havenga, M.
Right arrow Articles by van Es, H. H.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Havenga, M.
Right arrow Articles by van Es, H. H.G.
Stem Cells, Vol. 15, No. 3, 162-179, May 1997
© 1997 AlphaMed Press


Concise Reviews

Retroviral Stem Cell Gene Therapy

Menzo Havengaa, Peter Hoogerbruggeb,c, Dinko Valerioa,b, Helmuth H.G. van Esa,b

a Gene Therapy Section of the Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, LeidenUniversity, The Netherlands;
b IntroGene BV, Leiden, The Netherlands;
c Department of Paediatrics, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Key Words. Hemopoietic stem cell • Retrovirus • Gene therapy • Murine studies • Primate studies • Vector • Transduction

Dr. Helmuth H.G. van Es, IntroGene B.V., P.O. Box 2048, 2301 CA Leiden, The Netherlands.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Long-term in vivo gene transfer studies in mice have shown that recombinant murine retroviruses are able to infect murine hemopoietic stem cells with high efficiency. Taken together the results indicated that the proviral structure was present at high frequency in circulating hemopoietic cells resulting in significant expression levels. Because of the success of these murine studies, it was believed that gene therapy would soon be applicable to treat a wide variety of congenital or acquired human diseases associated with the hemopoietic system. However, results from gene transfer studies in nonhuman primates and first human clinical trails have indicated that murine retrovirus infection of primate hemopoietic stem cells is inefficient. Although there are essential differences between the murine and primate gene therapy studies with respect to the recombinant viruses and transduction protocols used, these differences cannot solely account for the differences observed in infection efficiency. Therefore, in recent years effort has been spent on the identification of factors limiting retroviral transduction of primate hemopoietic stem cells. Increasing knowledge concerning hemopoiesis and retroviral infection has helped in identifying a number of limiting factors. Novel transduction strategies and tools have been generated which attempt to circumvent these limiting factors. These factors as well as the strategies that showed increased retroviral infection of primate hemopoietic stem cells will be discussed.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Since 1980 when the feasibility of genetic modification of primitive hemopoietic mouse cells was demonstrated [1], investigators have been developing gene therapies for the treatment of a number of congenital and acquired human diseases. The pluripotent hemopoietic stem cell (PHSC) and its self-renewing capacity forms an ideal candidate for gene therapy because many of its progenitors are involved in human disorders. Although initial studies on transduction of hemopoietic cells focused on using the calcium phosphate precipitation technique [2], investigators soon switched to efficient gene delivery vehicles already present in nature— retroviruses. In 1983 the first successful gene transfer with a murine leukemia retrovirus of mouse hemopoietic cells was reported [3]. Since then a number of important scientific hurdles have been overcome such as improvement of the transcription machinery of the murine retrovirus to increase expression of the transgene in human cells, the development of efficient retroviral packaging cell lines, the development of specific and sensitive safety tests, and increased knowledge on hemopoiesis. This progress has culminated in highly efficient retroviral transduction of murine PHSC showing that, upon repopulation, sustained long-term expression from introduced cDNAs is detectable. By extrapolating the successes of these mouse studies it was believed that the treatment of patients would soon be a reality. However, once retroviral primate PHSC gene therapy experiments commenced, it became apparent that such an extrapolation was not justified. A better understanding of primate stem cell proliferation as well as the retroviral infection mechanism was clearly needed to enable the development of human stem cell gene therapy. Here we will present a survey of retroviral experimental stem cell gene therapy studies performed in mice and nonhuman primates and the data on clinical trails in human patients to date. Finally, putative factors limiting the retroviral transduction of the human stem cell and strategies aimed at increasing the retroviral transduction efficiency will be presented.


    Target Diseases for Stem Cell Gene Therapy
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Human congenital diseases which are manifested predominantly in one or more of the blood lineages are, in principle, target diseases for stem cell gene therapy, since all blood cells are derived from a common ancestor, the PHSC. There are, however, some limitations. First, the precise genetic defect causing the disease must be known. Second, the defect should not be dominant. In general, those diseases that can been treated by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation are candidates for stem cell gene therapy ( Table 1). Ideally, the aberrant gene in the PHSC would be replaced by a correct copy, a process known as homologous recombination. Homologous recombination does occur in nature in mammalian cells but at a frequency of approximately one in one million which at present is too low for gene therapy purposes [4]. Therefore, stem cell gene therapy has focused on the addition of correct copies of a gene in the host genome. One possible disadvantage of this strategy is the potential transformation of proto-oncogenes due to insertional mutagenesis. Moreover, the vectors need to be able to overcome the silencing effect or several copies should be introduced to increase the chance of introducing the gene in a preferred site.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Inherited human disorders which are candidates for stem cell gene therapy. The list includes only diseases associated with the hemopoietic system in which the single gene causing the disease has been cloned. The selection was based on the following sources: [128-130]. BMT: bone marrow transplantation; ND: not done.
 

    Retrovirus-Mediated Gene Delivery
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Gene delivery vehicles for gene therapy purposes can be either viral or nonviral. A wide variety of viral delivery vectors is under investigation such as retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpes simplex virus, vaccinia virus, poliovirus, baculovirus and Sindbis virus. Nonviral delivery is pursued using either "naked" DNA or liposome-complexed DNA. There are two important criteria on which the choice of a gene delivery vehicle is based. First, the accessibility of the target tissue to be manipulated dictates whether host cell transduction can be performed in vivo or ex vivo and, secondly, the desired persistence of transgene expression, which can be either sustained or temporary. For stem cell gene therapy, sustained expression of the transgene is a prerequisite for its success and therefore only gene delivery vehicles that assure stable integration into the host genomic DNA are relevant. Consequently, retroviruses and possibly adeno-associated viral vectors are useful for stem cell gene therapy. Here, only retroviral vectors will be discussed. Murine leukemia retroviruses have been the vectors of choice since the start of the field of gene therapy.

A general overview of the structure of murine leukemia retroviruses and their life cycle is depicted in Figure 1. Upon infection of the host cell, the viral RNA is released into the cytoplasm where it is converted into DNA by the viral enzyme reverse transcripts. Because the retroviral DNA cannot pass the nuclear envelope, it can only integrate in the host genome of cells that are going through mitosis [5]. Integration is facilitated by the viral enzyme integrase and the long terminal repeats present at both ends of the proviral structure. If retroviral integration occurs in a preferred site, the retroviral genes gag (core proteins), pol (reverse transcriptase and integrase), and env (envelope protein determining the host cell range or tropism of a retrovirus) are transcribed. In order to obtain infectious retroviral particles, full-length viral RNA, containing the packaging signal {Psi}, is complexed with viral core proteins. These RNA-protein complexes are then released from the infected cells by budding, carrying the envelope molecules with it. For the production of infectious, replication-defective recombinant retrovirus particles carrying a gene of interest, packaging cells have been constructed ( Fig. 2). Packaging cells are mammalian cell lines, genetically modified in such a way that they express the viral proteins gag, pol, and env without producing infectious particles since the encoding mRNAs do not harbor the packaging signal {Psi}. Upon transfection with a retroviral construct carrying the packaging signal {Psi} and a gene of interest, recombinant infectious particles are generated. Since the infectious particles lack the mRNAs encoding reverse transcriptase and integrase, these virus preparations are, in principle, free of replication competent retrovirus (RCR). RCR is a major safety concern. Pathogenicity of replication competent amphotropic murine leukemia viruses in nonhuman primates was initially tested by injecting large amounts of amphotropic RCR intravenously or by implantation of virus-producing autologous fibroblasts [6, 7]. Although these studies demonstrated rapid clearance of the murine retrovirus by the rhesus monkey sera, a later study demonstrated RCR induced T cell lymphomas in nonhuman primates [8]. By removing all overlapping sequences between the packaging constructs and the construct containing the gene of interest, the chance of generating RCR can be minimized [9-12].



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A) Moloney murine leukemia proviral structure. Between the two long terminal repeats (LTRs) are the coding regions for the viral gag, pol, and env genes. Also shown are the splice donor (SD), splice acceptor (SA), packaging signal ({Psi}), and primer binding sites (P[+] and P[-]). The LTRs are subdivided in three domains: U3, R, U5, which contain the transcriptional enhancer, promoter and poly-adenylation signal (AATAAA). Initiation of transcription and the beginning of the poly(A) tract is denoted by a horizontal arrow and (A)n, respectively. B) Wild type Moloney murine leukemia virus life-cycle. After binding to and entry into the target cell the viral (+) RNA genome is reverse transcribed into double-stranded DNA. The DNA is transported to the nucleus and integrates into the host genomic DNA, a process facilitated by the viral enzyme, integrase. The genes of the integrated retroviral DNA, or provirus, are transcribed and translated. The viral RNA is encapsulated with various viral proteins. The viral RNA-protein complexes subsequently bud from the cells.

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A packaging cell for recombinant infectious, replication defective retroviral particles. The viral genes necessary for packaging and integration are located on two plasmids which are introduced into mammalian cells: 1) a plasmid containing the viral gag and pol genes and 2) a plasmid containing the viral env gene. Introduction of a recombinant retroviral construct containing a gene of interest and a retroviral RNA packaging signal ({Psi}) yields full length{Psi}+ RNA molecules which are packaged. Since these recombinant RNA molecules lack the gag, pol, and env genes, replication in infected target cells is impossible.

 

    Stem Cell Gene Therapy Studies in Mice
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
To demonstrate the principle of gene transfer into PHSC, many researchers have used mice as an in vivo model. A schematic presentation of a bone marrow transplantation protocol used to assay retroviral transduction into murine PHSC is given in Figure 3. The protocol consists of pretreatment of mice with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cytosine arabinoside (Ara C) or Velban for two to four days because in vivo myelosuppression was shown to stimulate in vivo stem cell proliferation [13]. The harvested murine bone marrow cells are cocultured with retroviral producer cell lines, after which the nonadherent cells are isolated and infused in the tail vein of lethally irradiated recipient mice. Often, bone marrow from the primary recipients was harvested and injected into lethally irradiated secondary recipients to confirm PHSC transduction [13].



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Experimental design to study retroviral transduction into murine pluripotent hemopoietic stem cells. Myelosuppressive compounds such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are administered to donor mice several days prior to bone marrow harvesting to trigger in vivo stem cell cycling. The murine bone marrow is then harvested and cocultured with a retrovirus producer cell line in the presence of growth factors. The transduced bone marrow is subsequently injected into lethally irradiated syngeneic recipient mice. Upon full reconstitution of the first recipients the bone marrow is retransplanted into secondary lethally irradiated syngeneic recipient mice. Southern analysis of genomic DNA extracted from several tissues and biochemical assays to determine expression indicate whether retroviral transduction of PHSCs was successful.

 
Most stem cell gene therapy studies in nonhuman primates and humans have been performed with supernatant of amphotropic retroviral producer cell lines, therefore it is relevant to categorize the data of the mouse studies according to: A) the retrovirus tropism used and B) the transduction protocol used. Table 2A is a compilation of long-term gene transfer studies in mice. These studies are identical with respect to virus tropism and transduction protocol. From the data it can be concluded that with ecotropic retroviral vectors and a cocultivation transduction protocol, murine PHSCs can be transduced efficiently (>1.0 provirus copies/cell on average) resulting in long-term persistence of the proviral structure and relatively high levels of expression of the transgene in primary and secondary recipients. Since the use of amphotropic retrovirus was considered a better model for human gene therapy and because human cells including PHSCs are outside the host range of ecotropic retroviruses, several research groups have used cocultivation with amphotropic retroviral producer cells to infect murine PHSCs ( Table 2B). These studies indicated that initial transduction efficiencies, as established by provirus positive colony forming units of the granulocyte-myeloid lineage (CFU-GM), long-term culture initiating cells (LTC-IC), and day 12 colonies isolated from the spleen of irradiated and transplanted recipients (MRA-CFUs) were similar using either ecotropic or amphotropic retroviruses [14-20]. However, in primary recipients several months after transplantation the frequency of PHSCs harboring the transgene was, in general, 10-fold lower as compared to ecotropic virus. In addition, pretreatment of mice with 5-FU did not increase the amphotropic retroviral transduction efficiency in contrast to the combination of 5-FU treatment with ecotropic virus [13, 17].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Compilation of results from long-term in vivo studies in mice using either ecotropic (A) or amphotropic (B) virus in combination with a cocultivation protocol
 
A small number of studies have been performed in which the transduction efficiency of ecotropic and amphotropic viruses was actually compared directly. One of these studies indicated that infection with amphotropic virus resulted in expression and thus transgene presence for less than eight weeks, whereas infection with ecotropic virus resulted in expression for more than 44 weeks after transplantation [21]. In a similar study, ecotropic virus was shown to be approximately 50-fold more efficient in transducing murine PHSCs as compared to amphotropic virus [22]. The effect of cocultivation versus supernatant transduction has also been compared with either ecotropic or amphotropic retroviral vectors. These studies showed that cocultivation, in general, resulted in an approximately fourfold higher transduction efficiency of murine PHSCs as compared to supernatant infection [13].

In conclusion these data suggest that infection of murine PHSC with amphotropic virus is not as efficient as with ecotropic virus. Ecotropic and amphotropic retroviruses differ in the receptor that is employed for virus entry, and the observed differences might simply be explained by significant differences in receptor expression levels in PHSCs. Indeed in a comparative study on mRNA levels in mouse PHSCs (lin-c-kitbright), it was demonstrated that ecotropic receptor (mCAT1) mRNA levels in these cells are high whereas amphotropic receptor (GLVR2) mRNA levels were undetectable by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [22]. In addition to the use of a different receptor, ecotropic and amphotropic viruses differ in their postadsorption pathways (see below). It was also shown that upon culturing the murine PHSC in interleukin 3 (IL-3), IL-6 and stem cell factor (SCF), mCAT1 receptor RNA levels increased in murine lin-c-kithigh cells but GLVR2 receptor RNA levels did not [22]. Although no increase in expression levels of amphotropic receptor mRNA was observed in this study, increased infection with amphotropic vector of murine PHSC has been reported after addition of cytokines [14-20, 23]. This suggests that ex vivo stem cell proliferation plays an important role in the retroviral transduction process of PHSCs. Finally cocultivation infection is superior to supernatant infection of murine PHSC. This suggests that sufficient binding of retrovirus to target cells is another limiting factor since we believe that cocultivation decreases the distance between a retroviral particle and the target cell (see below).


    Gene Therapy Studies in Nonhuman Primates and Humans
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Many researchers have applied variations of the transduction protocols found to be successful in mice, including in vivo pretreatment of 5-FU and cocultivation, to PHSCs from large animals. Since ecotropic viruses are unable to infect primate PHSCs, other tropisms including amphotropic and Gibbon ape leukemia (GaLV) based viruses were used [24]. The effect of in vivo bone marrow priming with 5-FU has been tested in rhesus monkeys. In initial studies using CFU-GM to test transduction efficiency, increased numbers of transgene-positive CFU-GM were found after injecting 5-FU less than seven days prior to bone marrow harvesting [25]. Long-term in vivo studies in nonhuman primates showed that prestimulation of bone marrow with 5-FU did not result in a significant increase in the retroviral transduction efficiency of primate PHSCs [26-28].

To investigate whether cocultivation increased retroviral transduction in primate progenitors, clonogenic assays such as CFUs were initially used. Cocultivation of amphotropic producer cells with canine bone marrow cells [29, 30] resulted in approximately 40% provirus positive CFU-GM as established by drug resistance. In contrast, only 5% drug resistant CFU-GM were scored using supernatant transduction [31]. These initial experiments indicated that, similar to the murine situation, cocultivation was superior to supernatant transduction. To assay for transduction of PHSCs, both protocols were tested in long-term in vivo studies in nonhuman primates. In the first studies, only the nonadherent cells were reinfused in lethally irradiated recipients after cocultivation, which resulted in impaired repopulation of the hemopoietic system. Gene transfer demonstrated greater than 0.1 provirus copies per cell in the bone marrow resulting in less than 0.01% human adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity in the peripheral blood as compared to endogenous monkey ADA levels. Parallel studies in which the rhesus bone marrow graft was transduced using a supernatant transduction protocol showed that reconstitution of the hemopoietic system was within normal limits. Gene transfer in these monkeys was 0.2%-0.5% of endogenous monkey ADA levels in the peripheral blood [32-34]. In another study, the repopulation ability of the ex vivo manipulated graft was investigated using cocultivation transduction with producer cells genetically modified to produce gibbon IL-3 and human IL-6. Upon transplantation GM-CSF was administered to enhance hemopoiesis. Despite these precautions, reconstitution failed [35]. Of six rhesus monkeys transplanted in this study, three were found positive for the transgene for the duration of the study (<99 days). The impaired repopulation using the cocultivation protocol in rhesus monkeys may have been caused by the loss of stem cells either due to the adherence of stem cells to the retroviral producer cells or due to the loss of self-renewal capacity during ex vivo manipulation. To overcome the loss of stem cells during cocultivation, two different approaches were reported. Bodine and coworkers harvested stem cells after cocultivation transduction by including mild trypsinization and showed that both transplanted rhesus monkeys fully repopulated. The ADA transgene, however, was never detected in either monkey. In parallel, three monkeys received bone marrow which was cocultured with a murine stromal cell line that produces membrane bound SCF. Transduction was performed by addition of retroviral supernatant. The two monkeys analyzed 11 months after transplantation were positive for the ADA provirus, and human ADA activity could be detected at 3% of endogenous monkey ADA activity [26]. Other researchers performed cocultivation transduction with irradiated producer cells to prevent further growth of these cells and harvested the adherent cells by trypsinization. As a consequence, the irradiated producer cells were coinjected with the stem cell graft. The presence of irradiated producer cells had no adverse effects, and the hemopoietic reconstitution in these animals was normal. Gene transfer, analyzed up to four and a half years after transplantation, indicated 0.1% provirus positive cells in lymph nodes as established by PCR [28, 36, 37]. Due to the limited number of primate PHSC transduction studies where cocultivation and supernatant protocols were compared directly, a clear conclusion on whether cocultivation is superior to supernatant infection cannot be drawn.

In Figure 4 , a schematic presentation of two essentially different supernatant transduction protocols for gene transfer into human PHSC is shown. These protocols are named "short-term" ( Fig. 4A) and "long-term" ( Fig. 4B) based on the length of the ex vivo period of the stem cell graft. The "short-term" protocol aims at limiting the ex vivo period of the stem cell graft as much as possible to ensure the maintenance of the self-renewal capacity of PHSCs. As a consequence, only those PHSCs that are in cycle at the moment of transduction will be transduced. The "long-term" protocol aims at ex vivo stem cell cycling without inducing differentiation during 21 days in culture. Increased cycling should result in increased numbers of vector-positive PHSCs. In the "short-term" supernatant infection protocol, CD34+ cells are isolated from total bone marrow. CD34+ cells are enriched for PHSCs and are capable of in vivo repopulation of both myelosuppressed humans and monkeys [38, 39]. Using the "short-term" protocol, Xu et al. demonstrated efficient gene transfer into two rhesus monkeys. Transduction of rhesus CD34+ cells in the presence of IL-3, IL-6, and SCF for four days resulted in provirus positive granulocytes (0.1%) and B lymphocytes (14%) for more than one year after transplantation. Using this protocol an essential parameter was investigated, i.e., the requirement for myeloablation to obtain sufficient grafting levels of genetically modified PHSCs. Two rhesus monkeys receiving supernatant-transduced bone marrow without myeloablative treatment were found negative for the transgene within four months after transplantation [40]. These findings are reminiscent of a clinical study we conducted involving three nonmyeloablated ADA deficient patients in whom "short-term" transduced bone marrow was found positive for the ADA provirus until six to eight months after transplantation, but than became negative [41]. These findings suggested that myeloablative treatment is essential to prevent the incoming transduced stem cells from being outnumbered by endogenous stem cells. In contrast to the study described above, transgene persistence was reported for more than one year in three neonate ADA patients whose umbilical cord blood was reinfused without myeloablation after using a "short-term" transduction protocol [42]. The retroviral transduction protocol consisted of three exposures (24 h each) to the retroviral supernatant in the presence of IL-3, IL-6 and SCF. Semiquantitative PCR analysis of bone marrow CD34+ cells and clonogenic assays indicated a retroviral transduction efficiency of 1%-4%. This relatively high frequency contrasted with the frequency of vector-containing cells of the peripheral blood which ranged between 0.03%-0.001%. The authors suggested that although primitive progenitor cells may engraft without myeloablative therapy, they fail to undergo complete maturation in vivo. Upon decreasing the dose of polyethylene glycol-ADA, the recombinant protein that all three patients received directly after birth, the number of vector-positive T lymphocytes increased. This suggests a selective survival advantage in vivo for transduced, corrected T cells as seen in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation studies [43]. A major difference between the two clinical ADA studies described above which might explain the observed difference in transgene persistence is the different source of PHSCs used—bone marrow versus umbilical cord blood. Umbilical cord blood has a higher ex vivo proliferative capacity and engraftment potential as compared to bone marrow [44, 45].



View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Schematic presentation of the two essentially different retroviral supernatant transduction protocols used for the infection of primate and human PHSCs. A) Short-term supernatant infection protocol. CD34+ hemopoietic cells isolated from bone marrow, cord or mobilized peripheral blood are cultured for several hours or days in retrovirus-containing medium in the presence of growth factors prior to reinfusion into the recipient. Transduction of PHSC, albeit low, is usually only observed after myeloablative treatment. B) Long-term supernatant infection protocol. Bone marrow devoid of granulocytes and erythrocytes (postficoll) is seeded in retrovirus-containing medium in the presence of growth factors. The cells are cultured for 21 days during which the retrovirus supernatant is refreshed three times. After 21 days in culture, the adherent cells are reinfused into the recipient. Transduction of PHSC, albeit low, is observed with or without myeloablative treatment.

 
Brenner and coworkers reported on the persistence of the neomycin transgene, as measured by drug resistant progenitors, in two patients 18 months after transplantation. A single, six h, exposure to the retroviral supernatant without the addition of growth factors was performed and the transduced cells were reinfused in myeloablated patients [46]. In yet another study both mobilized peripheral blood and bone marrow were used for gene marking using two distinguishable retroviral vectors. With a "short-term" supernatant transduction protocol, three out of nine patients showed persistence of the neomycin transgene for greater than 18 months after transplantation at a frequency of 0.1% to 0.01% provirus positive cells in the peripheral blood [47]. The same authors reported on a study in which both mobilized peripheral blood and growth factor primed bone marrow CD34+ cells from rhesus monkeys were transduced using a 96 h supernatant transduction protocol which resulted in 5% provirus positive circulating cells up to one year after transplantation [48]. The relatively high transduction efficiency was attributed to the in vivo treatment of GM-CSF and SCF which resulted in a threefold expansion of primate PHSC in bone marrow.

In the "long-term" supernatant infection protocol postficoll purified bone marrow cells are seeded in culture flasks in retroviral supernatant. On day 7 and 14 of incubation the cultures are demidepopulated and the remaining cells are fed with nonvirus-containing medium. On day 8 and 15, one-half of the cell culture supernatant is replaced by fresh virus supernatant.

Using this protocol for the transduction of canine PHSCs, approximately 10% transduction was reported as established by drug resistant CFU-GM three months after transplantation. This relatively high transduction efficiency declined to 1%, 21 months after transplantation. Since comparative results were obtained with myeloablated and nonmyeloablated dogs, these authors suggested that marrow conditioning is not required for the retention of genetically marked cells in combination with this specific protocol [49, 50]. This "long-term" transduction protocol is currently being tested in a gene marking study in myeloma patients that underwent therapeutic marrow ablation. Preliminary results using PCR indicate that the transgene was present at a frequency of 17% (bone marrow) and 1% (blood cells) in two patients 12 months after transplantation [51]. Compared to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, efficient stem cell gene therapy would in principal allow one to omit severe myeloablative treatment. Clearly from the patient's point of view, a gene therapy protocol which has no myeloablation included is preferred and therefore should deserve full attention by those developing stem cell gene therapies.


    Factors Limiting Retroviral Transduction of Phsc
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
The long-term gene marking studies in dogs, nonhuman primates and humans described above have demonstrated retroviral transduction of PHSC resulting in multilineage transgene presence. However, a retroviral transduction efficiency leading to approximately 0.01%-5% provirus positive circulating cells is too low to expect clinical improvement for the majority of human diseases associated with the hemopoietic system. Therefore, a key question is how to increase the retroviral transduction efficiency into primate PHSC. This question is not easy to solve due to the nature of PHSCs—long-term repopulating capacity of hemopoiesis. This implies that any study on retroviral transduction involves long-term follow-up after reinfusion of transduced cells for at least one year in the case of primates and humans. Obviously, this poses practical problems for the development of improved PHSC retroviral transduction methods. Therefore, assays which predict the characteristics of PHSCs are important tools in the development of stem cell gene therapies. Common in vitro assays such as CFUs and LTC-ICs do not assay for true PHSCs since there is a clear discrepancy between the retroviral transduction measured by these assays and the long-term in vivo studies. Dick and coworkers ambiguously showed that CFUs and LTC-ICs do not represent the cells capable of long-term reconstitution. With a retrovirus carrying a neomycin resistance gene, transduction of human cord blood-derived CFUs and LTC-ICs was shown to be as high as 80% to 70%, respectively. The transduced human cord blood cells were subsequently used to engraft severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice as a model for primitive cells (see below). The transplanted cells repopulated the mice, but were negative for the neomycin transgene, confirming poor PHSC transduction studies in man and monkey [52]. Alternative in vitro assays to monitor retroviral transduction are based on flow cytometric analysis using cell surface antigens that are normally not expressed on primitive hemopoietic cells. Examples of such genes are murine heat-stable antigen [53], murine CD2 [54], the human nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) [55], and the human homologue of heat-stable antigen, CD24, which is expressed on the surface of human B cells only [56]. Detection of expression of the introduced genes in conjunction with other cell surface antigens predicts in which population of hemopoietic cells retroviral infection is most efficient. However, these experiments should be evaluated with caution. In an experiment in which the NGFR marker gene was used to assess transduction efficiency, high NGFR expression levels were already found one hour after transduction as measured by flow cytometry. Moreover, The NGFR transgene could not be detected in unsorted cells, which at the time of genomic DNA extraction were 50% positive for the NGFR protein. The authors speculated that since the retroviral particles were budding from packaging cells which highly express NGFR protein, the protein might be copackaged, resulting in false positive flow cytometry signals [57].

Nevertheless, using these assays, conditions expected to enhance retroviral infection into human hemopoietic cells can be screened for. Putative factors limiting retroviral transduction of primate PHSCs are extracellular retroviral half-life, receptor expression on PHSC, intracellular retroviral half-life, possible antiviral host cell responses and ex vivo PHSC cycling. Table 3 gives an overview of a large number of studies which have identified factors that limit retroviral transduction of PHSCs. These studies will be discussed in detail below.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Retroviral transduction of primate PHSCs: limiting factors. A compilation of results from studies that were performed in an attempt to overcome various putative factors thought to be involved in limiting retroviral transduction of primate PHSCs. See text for details
 

    Extracellular Half-Life, Brownian Motion and Virus-Cell Contact
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
At least two biological processes potentially limiting retroviral gene transfer are the short extracellular half-life of a retroviral particle and the distance a retroviral particle can travel in solution by Brownian motion. The half-life of a retroviral particle in cell culture medium is relatively short at 37°C, ranging between six and eight hours [58, 59]. Moreover the distance a retrovirus can travel by Brownian motion has been calculated to be less than 600 µm within one half-life [59, 60]. These two factors indicate that only those retroviral particles that are at close proximity to a target cell are able to bind to the cell. To increase the chance of binding, several techniques have been reported which aim at colocalizing the virus and the target cells.

One such strategy is calcium phosphate precipitation of virus onto target cells [61]. This technique increased retroviral transduction 50-fold. However, since the increase was only reported on NIH/3T3 cells, the increased transduction and possible toxicity of calcium phosphate on human hemopoietic cells is unclear. Fragments of the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin have also been used to colocalize virus and target cells. For stem cell gene therapy purposes a number of fragments have been identified that bind both PHSCs and retrovirus, resulting in a 10- to 50-fold increase in transduction efficiency [62, 63]. Fibronectin-facilitated transduction of murine PHSCs with an ecotropic ADA retrovirus resulted in long-term transgene persistence in mice. Human ADA expression levels in the peripheral blood, six months after transplantation, were similar to endogenous murine ADA levels in the animals reconstituted with bone marrow transduced by either fibronectin-facilitated supernatant infection or cocultivation [64]. Supernatant infection with the ecotropic virus did not result in detectable levels of human ADA, in contrast to previous studies which demonstrated long-term persistence of the transgene using an ecotropic virus and supernatant infection [65]. Dick and coworkers showed preliminary data indicating that fibronectin-facilitated transduction of human cord blood CD34+ cells resulted in vector-positive SCID repopulating human cells [66]. Centrifugation or flow-through transduction aims at increasing the retroviral transduction efficiency by enhancing the chance of virus binding to target cells. Centrifugation-mediated retroviral transduction has proved its use in increasing retroviral infection of human hemopoietic cells. Centrifugation-mediated transduction by three, two-hour infections at 2,400 g was shown to enhance retroviral infection approximately sixfold on human CD34+ cord blood cells [67, 68]. Flow-through transduction utilizes porous membranes on which target cells are cultured and exposed to retrovirus by passing the supernatant through the membrane and thus pass the target cells [59, 69]. This technique demonstrated a 50-fold increase in transduction efficiency without the need for polybrene or protamine-sulfate. Also, transduction was no longer dependent on the virus titer since similar transduction efficiencies were obtained with virus titers ranging from 102 to 105 infectious particles. Moreover, since one volume of retroviral supernatant is being circulated over the target cells, only a small volume of the retroviral supernatant is required. Retrovirus binding to a target cell is a process facilitated by positively charged substances such as polybrene or protamine-sulfate. Addition of these substances greatly increases the retroviral infection efficiency by modulating the natural charge repulsion barrier. The importance to overcome this barrier was stressed by a recent study which showed that by combining cationic lipids with retrovirus there was a 10-fold increase in retroviral transduction in human fibrosarcoma cells as compared to the addition of polybrene [70]. The finding that addition of polybrene did not enhance the effect of the cationic lipids and that the effect was attainable by lipid treatment of either cells or retrovirus suggested that modulation of charge was responsible for the effect observed. Cationic lipid-mediated retroviral transduction has also been shown to increase the retroviral transduction efficiency in human CD34+ cells and CD34+/CD38 cells [71].

Other approaches to increase retroviral transduction have focused on increasing the virus titer obtained with a particular producer by stimulating retroviral particle production and/or prolonging the extracellular half-life once the virus has been produced. Kotani et al. demonstrated a 10- to 100-fold increased virus titer when growing retroviral producer cells at 32°C instead of 37°C. This shift in temperature prolongs the extracellular half-life [58]. The use of sodium butyrate which increases RNA levels by generally enhancing promoter activity offers an alternative approach. Addition of sodium butyrate elevated the virus titer approximately 2- to 1,000-fold. The effect is not universal since the increase in RNA levels was shown to be dependent on the transgene present in the retroviral construct and on the retroviral producer cell used [72].

The significance of most of these strategies for increasing long-term in vivo transgene persistence remains to be investigated since CFUs and LTC-ICs were used to determine the increase in transduction efficiency. For this purpose gene marking of human bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood with retroviruses, in combination with flow cytometry and clinical gene marker studies, should be performed.


    Expression of Retroviral Receptors
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
The level of expression of retroviral receptors is another factor limiting transduction of primate PHSCs. By reverse transcriptase PCR it was demonstrated that mRNA levels of the amphotropic receptor, GLVR2, were low in human CD34+/CD38+ cells and very low in human CD34+/CD38 cells [22]. This finding has been supported by GLVR2 protein studies on fresh CD34+ cells from bone marrow, peripheral blood and cord blood [73]. This implies that receptor expression on human primitive cells might limit transduction using amphotropic viruses. To overcome low levels of expression of the amphotropic receptor on human primitive cells two different approaches are under investigation. The first approach focuses on using alternative receptors or altogether abolishing the need for receptor binding for infection. The second approach is to increase the expression of retroviral receptor mRNA levels in PHSCs. Concerning the use of other receptors, much effort has been spent on GaLV as an alternative to amphotropic retroviral vectors. This virus infects many mammalian species and a wide variety of cell types [24]. A retroviral packaging cell line has been constructed expressing the gag and pol proteins from Moloney leukemia virus and the envelope protein from GaLV [74]. A comparative study on mRNA levels of the rat homologue of the GaLV receptor and the amphotropic virus receptor demonstrated that in rodent bone marrow the GaLV receptor is expressed at significantly higher levels [75]. Although increased numbers of vector-positive CFUs were scored using the GaLV virus, a long-term gene transfer study in baboons using both GaLV and amphotropic virus resulted in 0.1%-1% vector-positive bone marrow cells for both pseudotyped viruses [76]. These results correlate to another long-term gene transfer study in rhesus monkeys. In this study 0.1% of bone marrow cells were gene marked after transduction with a GaLV pseudotyped virus. Analysis of amphotropic and GaLV receptor mRNA in rhesus bone marrow indicated that amphotropic receptor RNA levels were higher [77]. Increased transduction efficiency of human primitive progenitor cells has been reported using a GaLV pseudotyped retrovirus [78]. Within our group, retroviral transduction of human bone marrow cells with GaLV pseudotyped and amphotropic virus did not show a clear-cut difference between the two tropisms [79]. In addition, mRNA levels of the GaLV receptor were found to be at lower levels compared to amphotropic receptor in different human CD34+/CD38 subfractions [80].

Successful infection of cells which are normally outside the host range of a retrovirus has been reported. Innes and coworkers demonstrated infection with amphotropic retroviruses of Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of lipofectin. Lipofectin-mediated infection of cells lacking the receptor resulted in a titer of approximately 0.1% of the titer in cells which contained the homologous receptor [81]. Adams et al. demonstrated infection in HeLa cells when replication defective adenovirus and ecotropic retrovirus were simultaneously added to the cells [82]. Several observations made during this study suggested that the presence of the replication defective adenovirus enhances the entry of the retrovirus. The titer proved to be as high as 10% of the titer determined on cells within the host range of the retrovirus.

The other approach, which aims at increasing expression of a retroviral receptor on target cells, has also demonstrated increased retroviral transduction. Adenovirus-mediated transient expression of the amphotropic receptor in HeLa cells was shown to increase retroviral transfer 10-fold [83]. Transient expression of the amphotropic receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells increased retroviral transfer from 0% to 60%. Such a strategy might prove valuable since it has been reported that adenoviral vectors can infect human mononuclear cells and CD34+ and CD34+/CD38 cells [84, 85]. Whether overexpression of members of this family of retroviral receptors is toxic to human primitive cells remains to be investigated. In a similar approach, adeno-associated virus was used to deliver the ecotropic receptor (mCAT1) to a human cell (HeLa). Using flow cytometry it was shown that 80% of the HeLa cells expressed high levels of the mCAT1 receptor. Infection with an ecotropic virus carrying a LacZ marker gene and subsequent ßGal staining revealed only 30% infected cells [86].

Because both GLVR receptors function as sodium-dependent phosphate symporters, depletion of phosphate from the cell culture medium is expected to upregulate GLVR expression. Using a GaLV virus, supernatant infection in combination with centrifugation, phosphate depletion and low temperature incubation (32°C) demonstrated a 50-fold increase in transduction efficiency on peripheral blood lymphocytes. With an amphotropic virus, a 25-fold increase was observed [87]. The contribution of phosphate depletion on increased transduction was approximately threefold in this study. The effect of phosphate depletion on retroviral transduction of primate PHSC has not yet been reported. Although these studies described here demonstrate increased retroviral transduction by increasing the number of retroviral receptors on the cell surface, other studies have indicated that perhaps auxiliary receptors, in addition to the primary receptors, are involved in successful retroviral infection. The studies in which an ecotropic or amphotropic receptor was introduced in cells normally outside the host range of the virus indicated 70%-80% receptor positive cells. Subsequent infection with a retrovirus yielded only up to 30% of vector positive cells. In a study in which the ecotropic retroviral receptor was introduced in NIH/3T3 cells already expressing fair levels of the mCAT1 receptor, increased expression of mCAT1 did not result in increased transduction [88]. For this reason the authors postulated that a host accessory factor, present in limited amounts, might be required to facilitate Moloney murine leukemia virus infection. In this respect it is noteworthy to mention that mouse cells and some human cells that express CD4 cannot be infected by HIV, suggesting the need for accessory factors. Such factors have recently been identified [89]. Coexpression of CD4 with fusin, a 46 kDa protein which is a member of the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors, rendered mouse fibroblasts highly permissive for a T cell tropic HIV-1 virus carrying a LacZ marker gene as revealed by large syncytia and high ßGal expression. For macrophage-tropic HIV-1 infection, the chemokine receptor CCR-5 is required as a coreceptor for successful infection of target cells [90-92]. Whether auxiliary receptors for lentiviruses are an exception or a more general phenomenon in retrovirus infections remains to be investigated.

A significant number of investigators have reported on the design of retroviruses with a novel host cell range by modification of the envelope protein. These approaches include retroviral envelope molecules which display the antigen-binding site of an antibody resulting in so-called targeted retrovirus particles. Dornburg and coworkers employed the envelope molecule of the spleen necrosis virus (SNV) as the scaffold molecule. Like ecotropic murine leukemia virus, unmodified, wild type SNV is not able to infect human cells and therefore, specificity of a designed tropism should be determined by the foreign moiety of the chimeric molecule only. Using the SNV envelope, a number of antibody-envelope fusion molecules have been constructed including chimeric molecules displaying antibody binding sites for CD34 and Her2neu [93-95]. Preliminary data suggest that CD34+ cells can be infected, suggesting that the authors have generated targeted envelope molecules. To design envelope molecules that are universally applicable van Beusechem et al. have designed chimeras consisting of a retroviral backbone and the extracellular domain of the human immunoglobulin binding protein FcR{gamma}I. Such antibody binding molecules could in principle be used for targeting any cell surface marker including PHSC-specific proteins expressed at the cell surface, provided a suitable antibody is available and that entry through a particular receptor leads to stable transduction [96].


    Intracellular Half-Life of Retrovirus
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
The intracellular retroviral half-life is another factor thought to limit transduction of primate PHSCs. Once a retroviral particle has entered the cell, successful stable integration into the host genomic DNA is not assured. Little is known about parameters influencing processes such as reverse transcription or transport to the nucleus in PHSCs. One of the factors which is thought to play a role in determining successful retroviral integration is the route of entry of a virus particle. The entry route for ecotropic virus is different from that of amphotropic virus. Ecotropic virus binds target cells via the ecotropic receptor which is a transporter of cationic L-amino acids [97]. Upon binding, the retrovirus is internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis which is sensitive to lysosomotropic agents such as chloroquine [98]. Amphotropic retrovirus binds target cells via the amphotropic receptor, a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter [75]. Upon binding, the envelope of amphotropic retrovirus fuses with the plasma membrane which is a process that is not disrupted by lysosomotropic agents [98]. Since the ecotropic virus is presumably compartmentalized in endosomes, viral processes such as reverse transcription may be protected. For reverse transcription, a process which requires deoxynucleotidetriphosphates (dNTPs), the intracellular activity of reverse transcriptase may be influenced by the concentration of dNTPs provided by the host cell. It is known that in quiescent cells, such as primate PHSCs, the concentration of dNTPs is low. Zhang and coworkers demonstrated a 10-fold increased transduction efficiency in NIH/3T3 cells by incubating the retroviral supernatant in the presence of a high concentration of dNTPs prior to infection. Upon addition of dNTPs reverse transcription was shown to take place in the virion [99]. The increase in transduction efficiency was suggested to be due to a prolonged intracellular retroviral survival by abolishing the need for intracellular reverse transcription.

At present little is known about host cell factors involved in retroviral integration. Recently a host gene (Fv1) involved in controlling Friend retrovirus replication was cloned [100]. Of this Fv1 gene it was already known that it acts on Friend leukemia virus at a stage after entry into the target cell but before integration by direct interaction between the Fv1 gene product and the capsid protein [101-103]. The presence of the Fv1 gene product was shown to reduce viral titers up to 1,000-fold [104]. The Fv1 gene appeared to be derived from the gag region of an endogenous murine retrovirus, unrelated to murine leukemia virus. Sequence homology up to 60% to Fv1 was detected to the 5' region of the presumptive gag gene of a member of the human endogenous retrovirus family, HERV-L [100]. Some of the HERV members are known to be transcriptionally active in human cells. Therefore a host cell limitation similar to the Fv1 restriction may occur in human cells, including PHSCs.


    Stem Cell Identification and Ex Vivo Cycling
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
As mentioned earlier, Moloney murine leukemia viruses are unable to integrate into nondividing cells. Therefore, low levels of ex vivo cycling primate PHSCs are another limiting factor for most of the stem cell gene therapy protocols employing murine leukemia viruses. Two essentially different approaches are under investigation in an attempt to overcome this factor. The first is the design of retrovirus vectors based on lentiviruses. In contrast to type C moloney murine leukemia virus, type D retroviruses or lentivirus, such as HIV, can integrate in the host genomic DNA in nondividing cells because of the presence of two proteins encoded by the viral genome. These two proteins, matrix (MA) and Vpr, were shown to interact with the nuclear import machinery and mediate the active transport of the preintegration complex through the nucleopor. For gene therapy purposes HIV vectors have been constructed which contain as little HIV DNA sequence as currently possible. The generation of HIV-based packaging cells has been problematic since constitutive expression of some HIV proteins such as envelope, protease, and Vpr were reported to be cytotoxic. To circumvent the cytotoxicity of these proteins, a tetracycline-inducible expression system has been utilized to control expression of the HIV gag, pol, and env proteins [105]. Infection of HeLaT4 cells indicated that titers as high as 104 infectious units per milliliter could be obtained while RCR was undetectable. To circumvent the cytotoxicity of MA and Vpr, transient production of recombinant virus has also been investigated. A three plasmid expression system was used to generate HIV-derived retrovirus particles by transient transfection into 293T human kidney cells. Transduction of 208F rat fibroblasts resulted in a titer of approximately 105 infectious particles per milliliter in both exponentially growing and growth-arrested 208F cells as established by transgene expression [106]. In this study terminally differentiated nerve cells also were found to be susceptible to HIV recombinant virus. Several groups are now evaluating lentivirus-based vectors for efficacy in transducing low cycling cells such as primate PHSCs and terminally differentiated cells such as cells in the central nervous system.

The second approach to obtain increased retroviral transduction of primate PHSCs is to increase cycling using hemopoietic cytokines. The ideal cytokine or cytokine combination should enhance ex vivo PHSC proliferation without inducing differentiation. At present, it is believed that for long-term ex vivo survival and proliferation of hemopoietic cells at least three cytokines are required, namely IL-3, SCF, and mast-cell growth factor [107]. However, during a short ex vivo period these cytokines are not required. The cytokine combination needed to obtain efficient retroviral transduction of primate PHSC is not yet known. Some groups report on efficient retroviral infection using a combination of IL-3, IL-6 and SCF [47, 108], whereas others show that addition of IL-6 and SCF during a short-term infection did not result in enhanced stem cell proliferation compared to IL-3 alone [109]. The role of IL-3 on stem cell proliferation is also unclear since it has been reported that addition of IL-3 exponentially increased the number of total nucleated cells but also significantly suppressed the reconstitution ability of a murine bone marrow graft [110]. These authors suggested that, at least for murine PHSC, IL-3 may have a modulator role on the self-renewal capacity of stem cells. The role of transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß), which is a potent inhibitor of stem cell proliferation, has also received a lot of attention. Blocking of autocrine TGF-ß production releases early human progenitor cells and stem cells (CD34+/CD38) from growth restriction [111-113]. TGF-ß is present in the serum used to grow retrovirus producer cells and is also produced by mouse retrovirus producer cells and by early progenitors. Therefore TGF-ß is present at high concentrations during retroviral transduction. This might negatively influence human PHSC proliferation and thus transduction. Indeed, addition of anti-TGF-ß antibodies during supernatant infection resulted in a twofold increase in transduction compared to a standard supernatant transduction [114, 115]. The increase in retroviral transduction was correlated with increased PHSC cycling.

Several research groups have reported that culturing hemopoietic bone marrow cells on an autologous or allogeneic stroma layer increased the transduction efficiency approximately fourfold as established by percentages of provirus-positive CFUs or LTC-ICs [40, 116, 117]. In a comparative long-term in vivo study, significant levels of human CD34+ progenitor cells from bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood engrafted in immunodeficient mice up to 11 months after transplantation when cultured on stroma. In contrast, in the absence of stroma, sustained long-term engraftment failed [118]. In a recent study in rhesus monkeys, peripheral blood and bone marrow CD34+ cells were harvested after pretreatment of the animals with SCF and GM-CSF to mobilize primitive progenitors [48]. Subsequent retroviral transduction using a 96 h supernatant infection protocol resulted in approximately 5% provirus positive circulating cells for more than a year after transplantation. The in vivo cytokine treatment resulted in a threefold enrichment of rhesus stem cells in bone marrow (CD34+/CD38). These studies demonstrate the potential of the use of cytokines for stem cell gene therapy to increase retroviral transduction both on the level of ex vivo stem cell proliferation as well as in vivo stem cell expansion. Although progress has been made in identifying new growth factors and the antagonistic and synergistic interactions between them, studies on primate and human hemopoiesis have been hampered by the lack of true in vitro PHSC assays. At present, flow cytometric analysis is used to test the effect of growth factors and different culture conditions on various cell subsets derived from bone marrow, cord blood and peripheral blood. PKH2, detectable by flow cytometry, is a fluorescent membrane dye which equally divides among the two daughter cells when a cell divides [119]. Another compound is 7-aminoactino mycine-D, a fluorescent compound which intercalates with DNA enabling researchers to discriminate between quiescent (2n DNA), apoptotic (<2n), and cycling cells (4n DNA) [109]. To test the effect on primate PHSC of cytokines and different ex vivo culture conditions, SCID mice are currently used. These immunodeficient mice are deficient in B and T cells and were first shown to be promising tools for the study of human PHSC in 1988 by Mosier and coworkers [120]. Engraftment and multilineage differentiation of human progenitor cells derived from bone marrow CD34+ cells have been investigated in both transgenic SCID mice expressing the genes for human IL-3, GM-CSF, and SCF and in normal SCID mice by administration of purified growth factors at fixed time points. Averaged results obtained using either variant of the SCID model indicate that upon reconstitution these mice contain 1% to 10% human cells in the peripheral blood when using human bone marrow [121]. In contrast, up to 95% engraftment has been reported with human umbilical cord blood cells, in particular when non-obese diabetic (NOD)-SCID mice were used which are deficient in B cells, T cells, natural killer cells and circulating complement. The levels of circulating cord blood-derived human cells in the peripheral blood of NOD-SCID mice, six weeks after transplantation, exceeded 30% with both monocytes and leukocytes readily detected by flow cytometry [121-124]. The better engraftment of cord blood as opposed to bone marrow is explained by the higher enrichment level of primitive progenitors in cord blood and the high proliferative potential based on the ability of umbilical cord blood to generate expanded pools of progenitors during in vitro culture [44, 45]. Another immunodeficient mice model to study hemopoiesis was developed by McCune et al. [125]. These researchers surgically transplanted SCID mice with human fetal thymus and lymph node in an attempt to mimic the human hemopoietic microenvironment and growth factor requirement prior to addition of human hemopoietic cells. In 1994, CD34+ cells derived from fetal bone marrow or adult bone marrow were used in an engraftment study in SCID mice previously surgically transplanted with human fetal bone. The CD34+ cells were depleted of CD2, CD14, CD15, CD16, glycophorin A and CD19 lineage-committed cells. This hemopoietic progenitor cell pool maintained in the fetal human bone microenvironment was shown to retain multilineage potential and gave rise to T cells, B cells and myeloid cells in both primary and secondary SCID recipients. In contrast, large amounts of lineage-committed cells (CD34–lin+) did not lead to donor cell engraftment [126]. This latter finding was supported by a study recently performed in which transplantation of up to 108 CD34 human cord blood cells did not result in engraftment in lethally irradiated SCID mice. Also as little as 100 CD34+/CD38 cells derived from human cord blood cells were shown to be sufficient for repopulating SCID mice [66]. CD34+/CD38 cells derived from human adult bone marrow are also capable of engrafting in preimmune fetal sheep [127]. Concluding from the studies described above, the cells with the CD34 antigen and lacking the CD38 antigen are cells capable of engrafting and repopulating a hemopoietic system. However, additional information is required to conclude which subpopulation of CD34+/CD38 cells represent the human PHSCs. The various immunodeficient mouse models are now being used to test a variety of stem cell gene transfer methods including retroviral gene transfer. The immunodeficient mouse models may supply us with a relatively inexpensive assay for gene transfer into human PHSCs and therefore may allow us to screen for novel transduction tools such as the ones described in this survey.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...
 Retrovirus-Mediated Gene...
 Stem Cell Gene Therapy...
 Gene Therapy Studies in...
 Factors Limiting Retroviral...
 Extracellular Half-Life,...
 Expression of Retroviral...
 Intracellular Half-Life of...
 Stem Cell Identification and...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Gene transfer studies in mice have demonstrated the feasibility of genetic modification of PHSCs. However, for gene therapy to become a clinically relevant treatment, several problems have to be overcome. These problems include the identification of human PHSCs and the golden mixture of factors allowing ex vivo PHSC cycling and transduction without losing grafting potential. Furthermore, there is a need to improve or replace the murine leukemia virus-based retroviruses to overcome the blockades which are now thought to limit transduction of primate PHSCs, such as receptor expression and postadsorption pathways. The development of marker genes to assess retroviral transduction efficiency, engraftment assays in immunodeficient mice, and gene marking studies in nonhuman primates and humans are at present laborious but essential tools to study ex vivo and in vivo PHSC behavior and thus gene transfer into PHSCs. The strategies discussed here, which demonstrated increased retroviral transduction of early hemopoietic progenitors, are of great value since they have enhanced the general knowledge on the retroviral transduction mechanism. However, since the effect of most of these strategies on primate PHSCs is unknown, the value of any of these techniques for clinical stem cell gene therapy protocols remains to be investigated.


    Acknowledgments
 
Financial support was received from the Praeventiefonds and Genzyme Corp.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Target Diseases for Stem...