Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heins, N.
Right arrow Articles by Semb, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heins, N.
Right arrow Articles by Semb, H.

Stem Cells 2004;22:367-376 www.StemCells.com
© 2004 AlphaMed Press

Derivation, Characterization, and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Nico Heinsa,*, Mikael C.O. Englunda,*, Cecilia Sjöbloma,*, Ulf Dahlb, Anna Tonningb, Christina Berghc, Anders Lindahld, Charles Hansonc, Henrik Sembb

a Cellartis AB, Göteborg, Sweden;
b Department of Medical Biochemistry, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;
c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden;
d Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Transfusion Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

Key Words. Human blastocyst • ICM • Human ES cell • Pluripotency • Subcloning • Differentiation

Henrik Semb, Ph.D., Section of Endocrinology, Lund University, Klinikgatan 26, BMC, B10, SE-22184, Lund, Sweden. Telephone: 46-2223159; Fax: 46-2223600; e-mail: henrik.semb{at}endo.mas.lu.se


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The derivation of human embryonic stem (hES) cells establishes a new avenue to approach many issues in human biology and medicine for the first time. To meet the increased demand for characterized hES cell lines, we present the derivation and characterization of six hES cell lines. In addition to the previously described immunosurgery procedure, we were able to propagate the inner cell mass and establish hES cell lines from pronase-treated and hatched blastocysts. The cell lines were extensively characterized by expression analysis of markers characteristic for undifferentiated and differentiated hES cells, karyotyping, telomerase activity measurement, and pluripotency assays in vitro and in vivo. Whereas three of the cell lines expressed all the characteristics of undifferentiated pluripotent hES cells, one cell line carried a chromosome 13 trisomy while maintaining an undifferentiated pluripotent state, and two cell lines, one of which carried a triploid karyotype, exhibited limited pluripotency in vivo. Furthermore, we clonally derived one cell line, which could be propagated in an undifferentiated pluripotent state.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The inner cell mass (ICM) of the preimplantation blastocyst contains a core of cells, termed the epiblast, that have the potential to generate somatic and germ cells of the embryo. It has previously been demonstrated that human embryonic stem (hES) cell lines, exhibiting a stable developmental potential to form derivatives of the three germ layers after prolonged culture in vitro, can be generated by the isolation and culturing of the human ICM [1, 2]. So far, the available knowledge of conditions for deriving, characterizing, and culturing undifferentiated hES cells is largely based on a relatively few successfully isolated cell lines. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms that control the developmental decisions of hES cells in culture remain essentially unknown. It has been suggested that the poor success rates in developing ES cells in species other than mice is either due to fundamental biological differences between the species or simply due to technical factors associated with the derivation and culture conditions [3, 4]. For example, unless spontaneous differentiation of hES cells is prevented, the cells become gradually restricted and lose the characteristics of ES cells. Frequent passaging and optimization of the quality of the culture conditions and feeder cells may overcome this problem. However, many problems remain with regard to the optimal maintenance and expansion of hES cells.

Due to the limited number of available hES cell lines, there is an urgent need for the generation and characterization of more cell lines, as each line may have its own characteristics and advantages for different applications. Furthermore, the availability of more hES cell lines for comparison will aid in defining criteria for bona fide hES cells and the establishment of appropriate and robust methods for maintenance and expansion of hES cells.

Here, we describe the successful establishment of hES cell lines from the ICM by immunosurgery, from spontaneously hatched blastocysts, and from blastocysts after pronase-mediated removal of the zona pellucida. Three of the hES cell lines have been maintained in culture for more than 1 year, during which time high levels of telomerase activity, stable karyotype, and expression of markers characteristic for undifferentiated hES cells were maintained. The cells could be cryopreserved by vitrification without any effect on their ability to re-establish pluripotent hES cell colonies. The pluripotent qualities of these cell lines were demonstrated in several ways. Most importantly, the cells were able to differentiate into cell types originating from each of the three embryonic germ layers (endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm) in vitro as well as in vivo. In addition, we subcloned one of our cell lines and showed that it could be propagated in an undifferentiated state while maintaining its pluripotency both in vitro and in vivo, as was previously shown for other hES cell lines [5].


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Establishment and Culture of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines
Surplus human embryos from clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment were donated after informed consent and approval of the local ethics committees at Göteborg University and Uppsala University. Donated embryos were cultured to blastocysts until the age of 6–7 days as previously described [6, 7]. Blastocysts were graded (grade shown within brackets) according to Dokras et al. [8] and randomly selected for either pronase treatment (lines Fertilitetscentrum [FC]018 [B], Akademiska sjukhuset [AS]034 [A], and AS038 [B]) or pronase treatment followed by immunosurgery (lines Sahlgrenska [SA]121 [A], SA181 [B]) (see below). Spontaneously hatched blastocysts (line SA002 [B]) were placed directly in VitroHES supplemented with 4 ng/ml human recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (hrbFGF) (GIBCO/Invitrogen; Paisley, UK; http://www.invitrogen.com), and 125 µg/ml hyaluronic acid (HA) (Ophthalin, CIBA Vision Nordic AB; Askim, Sweden; http://www.cibavision.no) on a layer of mitotically inactivated early passage mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (F1 hybrid CD1xC57BL/6, Charles River Laboratories; Sulzfeld, Germany; http://www.criver.com). VitroHES was composed as previously described [5] and manufactured by Vitrolife AB (Kungs-backa, Sweden; http://www.vitrolife.com) where it was subjected to physical and functional tests as part of a quality control program to increase the final medium quality. The MEF cells were derived and cultured as previously described [9]. Briefly, the mitotic activity of the MEFs was abolished by an incubation with 10 µg/ml mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich Sweden AB; Stockholm, Sweden; http://www.sigmaaldrich.com) for 3 hours at 37°C, after which the cells were seeded at a density of 130,000 cells/ml in IVF cell culture dishes (Falcon 3653, Becton Dickinson; Franklin Lakes, NJ; http://www.bd.com) in MEF medium (Dulbecco’s-modified Eagle’s medium [D-MEM]) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 1x Glutamax (Invitrogen, Sigma-Aldrich). Prior to the addition of treated blastocysts or hES cells, the MEF medium was changed to VitroHES.

Blastocysts with intact zona were treated in pronase for 1–3 minutes (Sigma-Aldrich:10 U/ml in ICM-2 [Vitrolife AB] 1–3 minutes in three subsequent drops), washed three times in ICM-2 and plated on MEFs in hES medium supplemented with 125 mg/ml HA and 4 ng/ml hrbFGF. ICM-2 is a blastocyst culture medium containing recombinant human albumin and HA. Pronase-treated zona-free blastocysts selected for immunosurgery were washed twice in antihuman serum antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, 1:5 in ICM-2). After the second wash the blastocysts were placed in a new drop of the antibody and incubated for 30 minutes. The blastocysts were then extensively washed three times in ICM-2 medium followed by three washes in guinea-pig complement serum (Invitrogen, 1:5 in ICM-2). The blastocysts were then incubated for 10 minutes in guinea-pig complement serum and followed by three washes in ICM-2 and placed on MEFs in VitroHES supplemented with 125 µg/ml HA and 4 ng/ml hrbFGF.

ICM outgrowths were passaged to plates with fresh medium and MEF cells by mechanical dissection using Stem Cell ToolTM (Swemed Lab International AB; Billdal, Sweden). Established hES cell lines were routinely passaged every 4–5 days. The hES cell colonies were mechanically cut into pieces, 200 x 200 µm, and removed from the culture dish and transferred to a new culture dish with fresh MEF cells and VitroHES supplemented with 4 ng/ml hrbFGF.

Telomerase Activity
It has been demonstrated that high telomerase activity in ES cells correlates with their ability to divide indefinitely in culture [10]. Degradation of telomeric sequences or end-to-end fusion of chromosomes can lead to genomic instability [11]. To analyze telomerase activity in hES cells a polymerase chain reaction-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used (Roche Diagnostics GmbH; Mannheim, Germany; http://www.roche.com). The cells were harvested and lysed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Karyotyping and FISH
hES cells designated for karyotyping were cultured in hES medium supplemented with 0.1 µg/ml colcemid (Invitrogen) for 1–3 hours. The cells were subsequently trypsinized, fixed, and mounted on glass slides. The chromosomes were visualized by using modified Wright’s staining. For fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis, a commercially available kit containing probes for chromosome 13, 18, and 21 and the sex chromosomes (X and Y) was used (MultiVysionTM PB Multicolour Probe Panel; Vysis, Inc.; Downers Grove, IL; http://www.vysis.com) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each cell line at least 200 nuclei were analyzed. The slides were analyzed in a fluorescence microscope equipped with appropriate filters and software (CytoVision; Applied Imaging; Santa Clara, CA; http://www.appliedimagingcorp.com).

In Vitro Differentiation
The cells were kept on MEFs without passaging up to 14 days. Medium (hES medium without hrbFGF) was changed every second day. Alternatively, incubating clumps of hES cells in VitroHES without hrbFGF in suspension culture for 4–9 days generated both simple and cystic embryoid bodies (EBs).

Xenografting of hES Cells
Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice, [12] (C.B-17/lcrCrl-scidBR; Charles River Laboratories) were used as animal hosts for the xenografted hES cells. Four- to five-week-old animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections of ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar; Warner Lambert Nordic AB; Solna, Sweden; http://www.warner-lambert.com; 75 µg/g mouse) and medetomidine hydrochloride (Domitor; Orion Pharma Corporation; Espoo, Finland; http://www.orionpharma.com; 1 µg/g mouse). hES cell colonies were mechanically cut into 200 x 200-µm pieces, washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4 mg/ml human serum albumin and penicillin (Cryo-PBS; Vitrolife AB), and 20 cell clusters were injected under the kidney capsule or in the testicular lumen using a 200-µm lumen glass transfer pipette (Swemed Lab International AB). The number of cells transferred was approximately 20,000 to 40,000 per organ. Control animals were either injected with Cryo-PBS or grafted with primary brain cells from a littermate. The mice were resuscitated with intraperitoneal injections of atipamezol (Antisedan; Orion Pharma; 1 µg/g mouse), and kept on a heated pad until consciousness. Palpable tumors started to appear 3 weeks after transplantation. The tumors were allowed to develop for 8 weeks before the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. All animals appeared healthy during the 8-week period, and no animal died due to illness. The tumors were excised and immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, incubated for 24 hours, washed or stored in 70% ethanol, and processed in a Tissue-Tek paraffin infiltrator (Sakura Fine Technical; Tokyo, Japan; http://www.sakuraus.com), and paraffin-embedded. The tumors were subsequently sectioned in 6–8 µm sections with a Microm HM 360 (Microm GmbH; Walldorf, Germany). Samples were stained for morphology using hematoxylin and eosin with a Sakura DRS-601 stainer. To determine the origin (human, mouse) and tissue type within teratomas, we combined histopathological and marker expression analysis. To evaluate whether the tissues were of human origin we used several human-specific antibodies, e.g., anti-E-cadherin and anti-human nuclei (see below). To confirm the presence of tissues derived from all three germ layers, we focused on tissues that can be easily distinguished by histopathological methods, e.g., neuroectoderm, cartilage, kidney tubuli, and gut-like epithelium. To strengthen these conclusions, we also used antibodies against markers characteristic for derivatives of the germ layers, e.g., {alpha}-smooth muscle actin, desmin, nestin, ß-III-tubulin, {alpha}-fetoprotein, and HNF3ß.

Subcloning
The cells were washed inside the wells twice with cloning medium, 150 µl, 500 µl, and 1,000 µl for the 96-, 48-, 24-well plates, respectively. The inner part of the colonies was cut with a 300-µm Stem Cell ToolTM and subsequently incubated with 0.5 mM EDTA for 20 minutes at 37°C. The cells were triturated carefully with a pipette and diluted either in knockout (KO)-DMEM medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 15% concentrated conditioned medium, 3.5 mM glucose, 1 mM Glutamax (invitrogen-sigma-albumin), 1% NEAA (GIBCO), and 4 ng/ml bFGF, KO-DMEM medium supplemented with 15% FCS, 3.5 mM glucose, 1 mM Glutamax, 1% NEAA, and 4 ng/ml bFGF, or KO-DMEM medium supplemented with 20% serum replacement (GIBCO) SR, 3.5 mM glucose, 1 mM Glutamax, 1% NEAA, and 4 ng/ml bFGF. Single cells were picked and put into individual wells with MEF-coated plates. To confirm the colony-forming ability of the cells, positive controls were performed (e.g., 10, 100, 1,000 cells/ml or smaller clusters) as well as negative controls (wells without dissociated hES cells). Subclones were preferentially obtained in 15% concentrated conditioned medium of hES cells grown in presence of FCS.

Histochemical Staining for Alkaline Phosphatase
Histological staining for alkaline phosphatase was carried out using a commercially available kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunocytochemistry
The cells were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature, washed in PBS, and exposed to the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. As secondary antibodies, we used fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)- and Cy-3-conjugated antibodies (1:50, Southern Biotech; Birmingham, AL; http://www.southernbiotech.com). The monoclonal antibodies (mAb) directed against SSEA-1, SSEA-3, and SSEA-4 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, The University of Iowa; Iowa City, IA) were used at 1:200, whereas the TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81 mAbs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Santa Cruz, CA; http://www.southernbiotech.com) were used at 1:500. Neuroectodermal precursor cells and neurons were detected by a nestin mAb (BD Biosciences; Stockholm, Sweden; 1:100), and ß-tubulin-III mAb (Sigma-Aldrich; 1:100), respectively. Endodermal cells were recognized by a mAb against Cdx2 (gut endoderm, visceral endoderm) (BioGenex, Nordic BioSite; Täby, Sweden; 1:200; http://www.innogenex.com), and polyclonal antibodies against {alpha}-1-fetoprotein ([AFP] Sigma-Aldrich; 1:2000) and HNF3ß (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:500). Mesodermal cells were detected by a desmin antibody (Chemicon; Temecula, CA; http://www.chemicon.com; 1:200). hES cell-derived cells were detected by mAbs against human nuclei (Chemicon; 1:100) and human E-cadherin (Zymed Laboratories; South San Francisco, CA; http://www.zymed.com; 1:500). Some cultures were double stained with DAPI (4'-6'Diamidino-2-phenylindole, final concentration 0.1 µg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 minutes.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Methods for Deriving hES Cell Lines
The most commonly used method for deriving hES cell lines is by immunosurgical isolation of the ICM from the human blastocyst [1, 2, 13]. Here, we show that hES cell lines can be established from pronase-treated and hatched blastocysts as well (Fig. 1Go). Due to the limited number of embryos used in this study, we can, however, not conclude anything about the relative efficiencies of the different methods. Whereas cell line SA002 was derived from a spontaneously hatched blastocyst, cell lines FC018, AS034, and AS038 were established from pronase-treated blastocysts (Table 1Go). Immunosurgery was used for establishing cell lines SA121 and SA181. One to two weeks after plating, the expanded ICM was transferred to a fresh MEF-coated IVF-cell culture dish by mechanical dissection. Successful propagation of the ICM was associated with the appearance of ES-like cells in the outgrowth, whereas differentiated cells, presumably representing primitive endoderm and trophectoderm, either died or disappeared upon repeated passaging (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Human ES cell derivation from pronase-treated and hatched blastocysts. A) Blastocyst before pronase treatment. B) Outgrowth of pronase-treated blastocyst shown in (A) 6 days after pronase treatment. C) hES colony (passage 6) derived from the ICM in (B). D) Spontaneously hatched blastocyst. E) Outgrowth of the blastocyst shown in (D) 5 days after plating. F) hES colony (passage 3) derived from the ICM in (E).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of hES cell characterization
 
Characterization of hES Cell Lines
To analyze the long-term pluripotency and replicative immortality of the six newly established hES cell lines SA002, FC018, AS034, AS038, SA121, SA181, and subclone AS034.1 (see below), we used previously defined criteria for in vitro and in vivo characterization of hES cells by examining the morphology, marker expression, telomerase activity, karyotype, and pluripotency in vitro and in vivo.

In the presence of mouse feeders and human recombinant bFGF, all six hES cell lines gave rise to large compact multicellular colonies of cells with the characteristic hES cell morphology, i.e., a high ratio of nucleus to cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli. Some of these lines have been passaged more than 120 times. Initially, the different cell lines could not be discriminated morphologically from each other except for cell line AS038, which never developed a clear distinguishable border towards the mouse feeders (data not shown). However, with time the morphology of AS038 became indistinguishable from the other cell lines.

Karyotype analyses carried out at different passages (from passage three to passage 76) indicated a normal stable karyotype in four of the cell lines (Fig. 2AGo, Table 1Go). In two of the cell lines chromosomal aberrations were apparent, trisomy 13 in cell line SA002 (Fig. 2BGo), and triploid karyotype in FC018 (Table 1Go).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Karyotype of hES lines (see also Table 1Go). A) Normal 46XY karyotype from cell line SA181. B) XX karyotype from line SA002 with a trisomy 13. The arrow in (B) points to the trisomic chromosome 13.

 
Similar to undifferentiated pluripotent cultures of human germ cells [14] and previously established hES cell lines, all our cell lines possessed high levels of alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity (Fig. 3BGo, Table 1Go). The overall percentage of visible AP-positive cells within a colony varied from 60% to 90% in all cell lines. The hES cells lines were further characterized by expression analysis of five cell surface markers: SSEA-1, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81, and the intermediate filament protein nestin [1, 1417]. Figure 3Go depicts examples of the expression of these markers in undifferentiated colonies from cell line SA002. The results of the expression analysis are summarized in Table 1Go. Whereas all cell lines expressed SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81, they were, with a few exceptions (see below), negative for nestin and SSEA-1.



View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical marker expression analysis of cell line SA002 (passage 21). The colonies were analyzed 5 days after passaging. A) Morphology, (B) Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), (C) SSEA-1, (D) SSEA-3, (E) SSEA-4, (F) TRA-1-81, (G) TRA-1-60, and (H) Oct-4. Scale bar: 25 µm.

 
Oct-4 is a POU-domain transcription factor that is essential for establishment of ES cells from the ICM [18]. Similar to previous reports [19, 20], we found that undifferentiated hES cells expressed Oct-4 (Fig. 3HGo, Table 1Go), whereas Oct-4 was downregulated concomitant with differentiation (data not shown).

Nestin is expressed in a variety of stem/precursor cell populations of neuroectodermal and mesodermal origin, and we found it useful for detecting differentiated hES cells that could not be recognized by morphological criteria. Generally, nestin-positive colonies often appeared during suboptimal growth conditions and seemed to result in irreversible commitment. Interestingly, whereas TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81 were initially expressed normally in cell lines FC018 (passage 25) and AS038 (passage 41) (Fig. 4CGo and 4DGo, Table 1Go), a patchy expression pattern of SSEA-3 and SSEA-4 was observed (Fig. 4FGo, Table 1Go). Moreover, additional signs of cell differentiation were the appearance of SSEA-1- and nestin-expressing cells (Fig. 4BGo and 4EGo, Table 1Go). However, with time both line FC018 (passage 118) and AS038 (passage 72) expressed SSEA-4 and Oct-4 uniformly within the colonies (Fig. 4GGo and 4IGo), whereas nestin was no longer expressed (Fig. 4HGo).



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical marker expression analysis of cell line FC018. The colonies were analyzed 5 days after passaging. A-F: passage 25, G-I: passage 118. (A) Morphology, (B) SSEA-1, (C) TRA-1-60, (D) TRA-1-81, (E, H) nestin, (F, G) SSEA-4, and (I) Oct-4. Scale bar: 25 µm.

 
Finally, all six hES cell lines expressed high levels of telomerase activity that were maintained even after more than 50 passages (Table 1Go).

In summary, three of the six characterized hES cell lines, AS034, SA121, and SA181, exhibited the morphology, genotype, telomerase activity, and marker expression characteristics for previously reported pluripotent stem cell lines with a normal karyotype [1, 2, 13].

Analysis of In Vitro Pluripotency of hES Cell Lines
Similar to mouse ES cells, hES cells spontaneously form three-dimensional aggregates of differentiated cells known as EBs when grown in suspension. Upon continued in vitro culture of EBs, a variety of ectodermal, endodermal, and mesodermal germ layer derivatives, such as hematopoietic, endothelial, cardiac, skeletal muscle, and neuronal cell lineages appear [21]. We could show that all hES cell lines are capable of generating both simple and cystic EBs. Marker expression analysis and morphological examination of plated EBs revealed derivatives of all three germ layers, including areas of beating heart muscle-like cells (data not shown). However, EB formation is not an exclusive pathway for initiating hES cell differentiation. An alternative efficient and timesaving method to induce spontaneous differentiation of hES cells is simply by keeping the colonies on mouse feeders for more than 7 days without passaging. Similar to EB formation, this method gives rise to a variety of cell types derived from all three germ layers. The vast majority of cells within the differentiated colonies expressed neuroectodermal cell markers, such as nestin and ß-III-tubulin (Fig. 5AGo and 5BGo). These markers were preferentially expressed within typical rosette-like structures during early stages of differentiation (data not shown). Derivatives of mesoderm were confirmed by desmin stainings, and the appearance of synchronously beating cardiomyocyte-like cells (Fig. 5CGo, data not shown). Endodermal derivatives appeared later during differentiation in the periphery of the colonies and were identified by the expression of AFP, Cdx2, and HNF3ß (Fig. 5DGo–5FGo). In summary, based on in vitro differentiation, all cell lines displayed the potential to form derivatives of all three embryonic germ layers. Importantly, these characteristics remained the same after repeated freezing-thawing cycles (data not shown).



View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. In vitro differentiation of cell line SA002. The colonies were analyzed after 12 days after passaging. A) Nestin-positive neuronal precursors, B) ß-III-tubulin-positive postmitotic neurons, C) desmin-positive mesodermal cells, D, E, F) {alpha}-fetoprotein-positive (D), HNF3ß-positive (E), and Cdx2-positive (F) endodermal cells. Scale bar: 25 µm.

 
Since none of the described hES cell lines were clonally derived, it cannot be excluded that multiple precursor or stem cells committed to different lineages may coexist within a population of homogeneously appearing cells. Theoretically, this would imply that, until proven, it cannot be stated that a single hES cell is capable of forming derivatives of all three embryonic germ layers. In our initial efforts to subclone cell line AS034, we obtained one clone, AS034.1. To promote cell survival, we used concentrated conditioned medium from hES cells grown in presence of FCS as cloning medium (Materials and Methods). However, the overall yield was low; on average from approximately 103 dissociated single cells one colony resulted. Characterization of subclone AS034.1 revealed that it behaved comparably to the other cell lines in terms of the expression of SSEA-4, SSEA-3, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81 (Fig. 6Go). Importantly, SSEA-1 and nestin were not detected in undifferentiated colonies (Fig. 6BGo, data not shown). Furthermore, the subclone was capable of differentiating into ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal cell types both in vitro and in vivo (Table 1Go).



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunohistochemical marker expression analysis of subclone AS34.1. The colonies were analyzed 3 days after passaging. A-F: passage 12, G: passage 34. A) Morpholgy; B) SSEA-1; C) SSEA-3; D) SSEA-4; E) TRA-1-60; F) TRA-1-81, and G) Oct-4. Scale bar: 25 µm.

 
Analysis of In Vivo Pluripotency of hES Cell Lines
When clusters of hES colonies are xenotransplanted to SCID mice, they form teratomas consisting of cell types derived from ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. To analyze the in vivo pluripotency of the derived hES cell lines, we transplanted clusters of hES cells under the kidney capsule of SCID mice. Eight weeks after the transplantation the mice were sacrificed and teratomas were analyzed. To distinguish human cells from mouse cells, we used antibodies specific for human-specific nuclear antigen [22] and human E-cadherin. Xenografting of hES cluster resulted in two morphologically distinct structures in the kidneys. From a majority of the cell lines (SA002, AS034, AS034.1, SA121, and SA181) solid teratomas, consisting of highly differentiated cells and tissues derived from all three germ layers, such as gut epithelium; glandular epithelium (endoderm); cartilage, bone, smooth muscle, striated muscle, and kidney glomeruli-like structures (mesoderm); and pigment epithelial cells, neural epithelium, hair follicles, and stratified squamous epithelium (ectoderm) formed (Fig. 7Go, Table 1Go, data not shown). However, two of the cell lines (FC018, AS038) consistently formed fluid-filled cyst-like structures composed of hES cell-derived connective tissue and epithelial cells (Fig. 7BGo, Table 1Go). Infrequently, these cysts contained small solid teratomas consisting of cell types derived from several germ layers (data not shown). Thus, in summary, whereas all cell lines, including lines with an abnormal karyotype, exhibited pluripotent differentiation qualities in vitro, pluripotency in vivo was only consistently observed in lines SA002, AS034, AS034.1, SA121, and SA181



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Teratoma analysis. A, B) Low-power view of a solid tumor from cell line SA121 (A) and a fluid-filled cyst generated from cell line FC018 (B). C, D) Derivatives of the ectoderm. Pigmented epithelium (arrowhead) and neuroepithelium (arrow) are shown in C and hair follicles (arrow) in D. E, F) Derivatives of the mesoderm. Cartilage (arrowhead) and bone (arrow) are shown in E, and skeletal muscle in F. G, H) Derivatives of the endoderm. Gut-like epithelium with mucous-containing cells (arrowhead) and glandular epithelium are shown in G and H, respectively. Scale bars: 100 µm.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Here we report the derivation and characterization of six new hES cell lines. With a few exceptions the cell lines behaved like previously reported blastocyst-derived pluripotent stem cell lines. We believe that the phenotypic discordance in vitro and in vivo of some of the characterized cell lines is of value both for evaluating present characterization tools and for their further improvement in order to set up robust criteria for analyzing hES cells.

In addition to the previously reported immunosurgery protocol [1, 23], we report the successful derivation of hES cell lines from a spontaneously hatched blastocyst, and from blastocysts after enzymatic removal of the zona pellucida by pronase. A possible drawback of only removing the zona is overgrowth by the trophectoderm and the possible generation of trophectoderm stem cell lines. However, this should also be taken into account when using immunosurgery since this method does not guarantee complete removal of trophectoderm cells. Nevertheless, due to the morphology of trophoectoderm cells, i.e., flattened and polarized as they mature [24], they can be discriminated from the ICM once plated on MEFs. The fact that all of our cell lines expressed Oct-4, which normally is downregulated during differentiation and in trophectoderm stem cells [18, 19], substantiates our conclusion that the derived pluripotent stem cells were derived from the ICM.

Although four of our cell lines appeared phenotypically similar to previously derived hES cell lines [1, 2, 13], two of the cell lines (FC018 and AS038) were phenotypically different. Instead of generating solid teratomas upon xenografting, they developed into cyst-like structures. In contrast, when differentiated in vitro these lines generated cell types from all three germ layers. Except for their morphology in culture, which was similar to the "normal" hES cell lines, FC018 and AS038 also exhibited aberrant expression patterns of some of the markers characteristic for undifferentiated and differentiated hES cells, respectively. However, with time, the expression of these markers became reminiscent of normal hES cells. Whether the temporal shift in marker expression pattern in these cell lines can be explained by an initial mixed population of cells which went through selection, or whether cells were more prone to spontaneously differentiate initially, is presently unclear.

Our results indicate that adding early differentiation markers, such as nestin, to the list of markers whose expression patterns are analyzed in undifferentiated hES cells improves the detection of early hES cell differentiation. We show that the expression of nestin, a marker for stem/precursor cells of neuroectodermal and mesodermal origin, precede visible morphological signs of differentiation. We also found that the frequent spontaneous commitment to the neuroectodermal pathway of cell lines FC018 and AS038 correlate with loss of developmental potential to form derivatives of the three germ layers in vivo.

By definition, clonal expansion of hES cells is a prerequisite for the strict definition of pluripotent cell lines. Currently, the culture conditions for clonal expansion of hES cells are suboptimal. Unlike mouse ES cells, hES cells die at a high rate when they are dissociated into single cells [5]. Depending on which cell line was used, only 0.1%-1% of plated single cells was able to generate colonies that could be propagated. Among the few clones that survived, the majority were lost due to irreversible differentiation. We found that concentrated conditioned medium from hES cells grown in the presence of FCS promoted cell survival and maintenance of an undifferentiated fate. In general, our experience is that culture conditions that may be rate limiting for maintaining undifferentiated growth of hES cells include MEF quality and density, changes in the osmolarity, pH, and temperature of the medium, as well as the presence of supplements, such as ß-mercaptoethanol.

The stable maintenance of diploid chromosome number in the majority of our cell lines indicates that our cell lines maintained a stable karyotype in vitro after extensive passaging and repeated freezing/thawing cycles. The fact that two of the stem cell lines were chromosomally abnormal is not surprising taking into account that Hardarson et al. [25] recently found that only 42% of surplus IVF embryos were chromosomally normal at the blastocyst stage.

Consistent with previous reports, xenografting of most of our cell lines (SA002, AS034, AS034.1, SA118, and SA121) generated solid teratomas consisting of endodermal, mesodermal, and ectodermal cell type derivatives [1, 2, 5]. However, some of the cell lines (FC018, AS038) preferentially generated fluid-filled cyst-like structures of human origin. We have yet to determine the cellular identity and origin of these cysts. Potentially, these cells may be of trophoectoderm origin, since it was recently shown that hES cells are capable of differentiating into extraembryonic derivatives, such as trophoblast cells [26]. Alternatively, FC018 and AS038 may represent primitive endoderm lineages. However, the facts that undifferentiated colonies of these cell lines expressed significant levels of Oct-4, and that they lacked expression of primitive endoderm markers, such as Gata4 and AFP [27, 28], suggest that it is unlikely that they are of extraembryonic or primitive endoderm origin (data not shown).

Needless to say, more knowledge is needed about basic hES cell biology, such as the regulatory pathways that govern self-renewal and differentiation, before it will be possible to appreciate the potential applications of hES cells in basic science and cell-replacement therapy.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We acknowledge Katarina Andersson, Karin Axelsson, and Angelica Niklasson for assistance with derivation, characterization, and propagation of hES cells; Anita Sjögren and Thorir Hardarson for culture of human embryos; Gunilla Caisander for karyotyping and FISH analysis; Inger Bryman and staff at the IVF clinic at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Monalill Lundqvist at IVF clinic at the Uppsala University Hospital; and Matts Wikland at Fertility Center Scandinavia for supplying embryos. We thank Marie Rehnström and Ulrika Karlsson for assistance in subcloning; Gabriella Brolén for support in stainings and cell culture; and Peter Sartipy for general assistance. The work was supported by grants from the Cell Therapeutics Scandinavia AB, Swedish Research Council (H.S.), Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (H.S.), and Inga Britt och Arne Lundbergs Forskningsstiftelse (H.S.).


    FOOTNOTES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Present address for Ulf Dahl: Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA

* These authors contributed equally. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998;282:1145–1147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY et al. Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:399–404.[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Bongso A, Fong CY, Ng SC et al. Isolation and culture of inner cell mass cells from human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2110–2117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Piedrahita JA, Anderson GB, BonDurant RH. On the isolation of embryonic stem (ES) cells: comparative behavior of murine, porcine, and ovine embryos. Theriogenology 1990;34:879–901.

  5. Amit M, Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS et al. Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture. Dev Biol 2000;227:271–278.[CrossRef][Medline]

  6. Sjoblom C, Wikland M, Robertson SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes human blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod 1999;14:3069–3076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Bergh C, Howles CM, Borg K et al. Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) versus highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HP): results of a randomized comparative study in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2133–2139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Dokras A, Sargent IL, Barlow DH. Human blastocyst grading: an indicator of developmental potential? Hum Reprod 1993;8:2119–2127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Hogan B, Beddinton R, Costatini F et al. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd Ed. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1994:260–261.

  10. Thomson JA, Marshall VS. Primate embryonic stem cells. Curr Top Dev Biol 1998;38:133–165.[Medline]

  11. McEachern MJ, Krauskopf A, Blackburn EH. Telomeres and their control. Annu Rev Genet 2000;34:331–358.[CrossRef][Medline]

  12. Bosma MJ, Carroll AM. The SCID mouse mutant: definition, characterization, and potential uses. Annu Rev Immunol 1991;9:323–350.[CrossRef][Medline]

  13. Mitalipova M, Calhoun J, Shin S et al. Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from discarded embryos. STEM CELLS 2003;21:521–526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG et al. Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:7844–7848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Andrews PW, Casper J, Damjanov I et al. Comparative analysis of cell surface antigens expressed by cell lines derived from human germ cell tumours. Int J Cancer 1996;66:806–816.[CrossRef][Medline]

  16. Knowles BB, Aden DP, Solter D. Monoclonal antibody detecting a stage-specific embryonic antigen (SSEA-1) on preimplantation mouse embryos and teratocarcinoma cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1978;81:51–53.[Medline]

  17. Lendahl U, Zimmerman LB, McKay RD. CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell 1990;60:585–595.[CrossRef][Medline]

  18. Hansis C, Grifo JA, Krey LC. Oct-4 expression in inner cell mass and trophectoderm of human blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod 2000;6:999–1004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Lebkowski JS, Gold J, Xu C et al. Human embryonic stem cells: culture, differentiation, and genetic modification for regenerative medicine applications. Cancer J 2001;7 (suppl 2):83–93.

  20. Xu C, Inokuma MS, Denham J et al. Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:971–974.[CrossRef][Medline]

  21. Itskovitz-Eldor J, Schuldiner M, Karsenti D et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies compromising the three embryonic germ layers. Mol Med 2000;6:88–95.[Medline]

  22. Vescovi AL, Parati EA, Gritti A et al. Isolation and cloning of multipotential stem cells from the embryonic human CNS and establishment of transplantable human neural stem cell lines by epigenetic stimulation. Exp Neurol 1999;156:71–83.[CrossRef][Medline]

  23. Solter D, Knowles BB. Immunosurgery of mouse blastocyst. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975;72:5099–5102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Talbot NC, Powell AM, Rexroad CE Jr. In vitro pluripotency of epiblasts derived from bovine blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev 1995;42:35–52.[CrossRef][Medline]

  25. Hardarson T, Caisander G, Sjogren A et al. A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2003;18:399–407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Xu RH, Chen X, Li DS et al. BMP4 initiates human embryonic stem cell differentiation to trophoblast. Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:1261–1264.[CrossRef][Medline]

  27. Dziadek MA, Andrews GK. Tissue specificity of alpha-fetoprotein messenger RNA expression during mouse embryogenesis. EMBO J 1983;2:549–554.[Medline]

  28. Arceci RJ, King AA, Simon MC et al. Mouse GATA-4: a retinoic acid-inducible GATA-binding transcription factor expressed in endodermally derived tissues and heart. Mol Cell Biol 1993;13:2235–2246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received August 1, 2003; accepted for publication December 1, 2003.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
A. Raya, I. Rodriguez-Piza, B. Aran, A. Consiglio, P.N. Barri, A. Veiga, and J.C. Izpisua Belmonte
Generation of Cardiomyocytes from New Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Poor-quality Blastocysts
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, November 26, 2008; (2008) sqb.2008.73.038v2.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
X. Sun, X. Long, Y. Yin, Y. Jiang, X. Chen, W. Liu, W. Zhang, H. Du, S. Li, Y. Zheng, et al.
Similar biological characteristics of human embryonic stem cell lines with normal and abnormal karyotypes
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2185 - 2193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
J. Synnergren, K. Akesson, K. Dahlenborg, H. Vidarsson, C. Ameen, D. Steel, A. Lindahl, B. Olsson, and P. Sartipy
Molecular Signature of Cardiomyocyte Clusters Derived from Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Stem Cells, July 1, 2008; 26(7): 1831 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
N. Lavon, K. Narwani, T. Golan-Lev, N. Buehler, D. Hill, and N. Benvenisty
Derivation of Euploid Human Embryonic Stem Cells from Aneuploid Embryos
Stem Cells, July 1, 2008; 26(7): 1874 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. Unger, H. Skottman, P. Blomberg, M. Sirac Dilber, and O. Hovatta
Good manufacturing practice and clinical-grade human embryonic stem cell lines
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2008; 17(R1): R48 - R53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Turetsky, E. Aizenman, Y. Gil, N. Weinberg, Y. Shufaro, A. Revel, N. Laufer, A. Simon, D. Abeliovich, and B.E. Reubinoff
Laser-assisted derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines from IVF embryos after preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 46 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
B. Thyagarajan, Y. Liu, S. Shin, U. Lakshmipathy, K. Scheyhing, H. Xue, C. Ellerstrom, R. Strehl, J. Hyllner, M. S. Rao, et al.
Creation of Engineered Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Using phiC31 Integrase
Stem Cells, January 1, 2008; 26(1): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Strom, J. Inzunza, K.-H. Grinnemo, K. Holmberg, E. Matilainen, A.-M. Stromberg, E. Blennow, and O. Hovatta
Mechanical isolation of the inner cell mass is effective in derivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3051 - 3058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
S. Kim, S. E. Ahn, J. H. Lee, D.-S. Lim, K.-S. Kim, H.-M. Chung, and S.-H. Lee
A Novel Culture Technique for Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using Porous Membranes
Stem Cells, October 1, 2007; 25(10): 2601 - 2609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
C. Ellerstrom, R. Strehl, K. Noaksson, J. Hyllner, and H. Semb
Facilitated Expansion of Human Embryonic Stem Cells by Single-Cell Enzymatic Dissociation
Stem Cells, July 1, 2007; 25(7): 1690 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C. Allegrucci and L.E. Young
Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 103 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
J. Synnergren, T. L. Giesler, S. Adak, R. Tandon, K. Noaksson, A. Lindahl, P. Nilsson, D. Nelson, B. Olsson, M. C.O. Englund, et al.
Differentiating Human Embryonic Stem Cells Express a Unique Housekeeping Gene Signature
Stem Cells, February 1, 2007; 25(2): 473 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.-F. Chen, H.-C. Kuo, C.-L. Chien, C.-T. Shun, Y.-L. Yao, P.-L. Ip, C.-Y. Chuang, C.-C. Wang, Y.-S. Yang, and H-N. Ho
Derivation, characterization and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells: comparing serum-containing versus serum-free media and evidence of germ cell differentiation
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 567 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
A. Norstrom, K. Akesson, T. Hardarson, L. Hamberger, P. Bjorquist, and P. Sartipy
Molecular and Pharmacological Properties of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2006; 231(11): 1753 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. A De Sousa, G. Galea, and M. Turner
The road to providing human embryo stem cells for therapeutic use: the UK experience.
Reproduction, November 1, 2006; 132(5): 681 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Skottman and O. Hovatta
Culture conditions for human embryonic stem cells.
Reproduction, November 1, 2006; 132(5): 691 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
S. Mitalipov, H.-C. Kuo, J. Byrne, L. Clepper, L. Meisner, J. Johnson, R. Zeier, and D. Wolf
Isolation and Characterization of Novel Rhesus Monkey Embryonic Stem Cell Lines
Stem Cells, October 1, 2006; 24(10): 2177 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
C. Ellerstrom, R. Strehl, K. Moya, K. Andersson, C. Bergh, K. Lundin, J. Hyllner, and H. Semb
Derivation of a Xeno-Free Human Embryonic Stem Cell Line
Stem Cells, October 1, 2006; 24(10): 2170 - 2176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]